Connect with us


“Corner Crossing” Case May Open Millions of Acres to Hunting



Remember those four hunters who used a ladder to reach public land?

Backcountry Hunters & Anglers has filed an amicus brief in a high-profile public access case that the U.S. District Court for Wyoming is expected to hear this summer. The ruling in the case, Iron Bar Holdings vs. Bradly Cape et al, could help establish the legality of a means of accessing public lands known as “corner crossing,” the act of stepping from one corner of a parcel of public land to another, potentially opening up access to millions of acres in 11 Western states.

Public lands can be inaccessible due to being “landlocked,” surrounded by private land on which there is no easement, public road or public trail. In the fall of 2021, four non-resident hunters were issued citations in Carbon County. Wyoming, for criminal trespass. The four hunters never touched private lands: They used a ladder to cross between adjoining corners of public lands managed by the BLM.

In its brief, BHA maintains that the plaintiff in this case “cannot secure for itself the value of public land interspersed with its property by threatening trespass, since the government and its licensees (the public) have an equal right to access their lands.”

As the basis for its position, BHA relies on the Unlawful Inclosures Act, passed by Congress in the late 1800s to settle the range wars erupting between cattlemen and farmers over access and use of land in the West, as well as cases interpreting that law. The UIA outlines broad prescriptions against enclosing public land, emphasizing that “no person, by force, threats, intimidation, or by any fencing or inclosing, or any other unlawful means, shall prevent or obstruct … any person from peaceably entering upon … any tract of public land … or shall prevent or obstruct free passage or transit over or through the public lands.”

As early as 1897, the Supreme Court held that the UIA protects corner crossing as a means for members of the public to access public lands. In the years since, federal courts have continued to apply the UIA to prevent private landowners from prohibiting corner crossing from public land to public land. As one example, in 1988 a Federal Circuit Court held that the “UIA proscribes unlawful enclosures; enclosures are unlawful when they deny access to public lands for ‘lawful purposes.’” That decision upheld a lower court’s finding that “the free passage of hunters and their quarry is a lawful purpose for which the public may seek access to public lands.”

Absent the protections of the UIA, “a barrier embracing many thousand acres of public lands would be raised, unsurmountable except upon terms prescribed by [landowners],” explained another early 20th century Circuit Court decision. “Not even a solitary horseman could pick his way across without trespassing,” the court explained, holding that threats of trespass could not be used to prevent corner crossing under the UIA.

BHA’s brief also argues that the UIA takes precedence over conflicting state law. “Federal law, not state law, governs the issue of whether private landowners can prevent corner crossing,” BHA’s brief says. “The UIA reflects the exercise of Congress’ police power to abate the nuisance of landowners proscribing access to public land at corners, overriding competing state law concerns.”

“A landowner with half the ownership of a corner does not have the right to restrict public access by the owner of the other half of the corner – namely the federal government, and by extension, the people of the United States of America,” said Land Tawney, BHA president and CEO.

“BHA members rely on access to public lands and waters to pursue our passions,” Tawney continued, “and thus we are deeply invested in resolving the issues surrounding corner crossing.”

BHA’s Wyoming chapter has risen to defend the four hunters, raising funds – currently more than $115,000 – for their legal defenseThousands of BHA members and supporters likewise have pledged their support for corner crossing and the ability of members of the public to legally access U.S. public lands.

“Since BHA was founded around a campfire almost 20 years ago, we have been proud to fight for the values of the public lands hunter and angler,” Tawney stated, “and we are committed to ensuring that access to our public lands and waters is freely available to us all. We thank the court for its decision to grant our motion to participate in the proceedings, and we feel strongly that we can offer unique information and perspectives that can help the court as it considers the issues presented in this case.”



  1. Justin Burd

    December 10, 2022 at 1:46 pm

    I read the article and now I’m a little confused, namely- if the law allowing access to public lands has been on the books for over a century, why were law enforcement even responding, and why were the hunters sited, let alone arrested? This all goes back to the fact that “law enforcement” is somehow not required to know the laws they’re supposedly enforcing, but private citizens are. How did this get so far as to make it into a courtroom? Several people dropped the ball on this one, including law enforcement and the land owner. If it were me, I’d be suing the land owner and law enforcement for a lot more than legal fees. I’d make it so financially painful for both so that something like this NEVER HAPPENS AGAIN. Unbelievable that it made all the way to court.

  2. Chris Gee

    December 9, 2022 at 2:30 pm

    All states already have in place a legal means to gain access for a “landlocked” owner across some one else land as an easement. Access to public lands should be no different. According to the UIA, a land owner must allow access by some means to a land locked parcel, either by corner access or a more convenient place that they could choose. Whoever issued this citation doesn’t know the law, and exceeded their authority.

  3. Rev Andrew Marcell

    December 9, 2022 at 10:27 am

    What about the right of the land owner to have the quiet enjoyment of their lands? If I put up.a gate to keep out off road vehicles and others who think that they have access to my posted lands, and said road is on my property, is this not essentially taking that land without compensation? Additionally, what protection do I have in terms of liability if someone gets hurt ? This why gates are put up.

    • g Hughes

      December 9, 2022 at 11:33 am

      not your land is not your land and you can’t prevent people from accessing it.

    • Big Al 45

      December 9, 2022 at 12:44 pm

      ALL of this should have disclosed when you bought said property. If you inherited it, then you as the property owner should have hired an attorney and a Surveyor in this field to define your lands.
      Property boundaries are Public knowledge, there is no excuse for NOT knowing your lands, and any and all right of access on or bordering your lands.
      I have dealt with private owners trying to bully me on Boundary’s, it’s annoying and often selfish on their part.

    • Dave Eason

      December 10, 2022 at 1:40 am

      Every county, city, town, parrish, state or whatever, has easements for your property. If they need to replace main water lines that run under your property they can dig them up. If they upgrade electrical lines or fiber optic cable underground they can trench right thru your land. You do raise a valid concern tho about the liability. I’d get in touch with an attorney

    • Pappy

      December 10, 2022 at 11:38 am

      I respect your concerns and do believe as a hunter I should know both boundaries of public/ private and be in contact with private to ask permission of opening gate for access. If not granted then it could lead to legal issues or possibly another access point ???

  4. Wes D

    December 8, 2022 at 1:41 pm

    So, how in the hell could they 1) be trespassing; 2) how were they reported and charged/prosecuted and 3) why did it even go to trial let alone become so expensive!?!?!?

    • Kimberpross

      December 10, 2022 at 2:14 pm

      That is our legal system. The government can pass into law bills that are in violation of the Constitution and Bill of Rights and be in effect until some advocacy group files a suit and have a judge determine Constitutionality and toss.. It appears law enforcement can be ignorant of the laws, write the citation and let the judge settle it. Those a classic liberal practices.


    December 8, 2022 at 11:55 am

    Win this case then go after the road closures that plague montana, many landowners just put up a gate and post the road as private!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Newsletter Sign Up


Copyright © 2021 Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. Popular Outdoorsman is a wholly owned subsidiary of Brand Avalanche Media, LLC. This copyrighted material may not be republished without express permission. The information presented here is for general educational purposes only. MATERIAL CONNECTION DISCLOSURE: You should assume that this website has an affiliate relationship and/or another material connection to the persons or businesses mentioned in or linked to from this page and may receive commissions from purchases you make on subsequent web sites. You should not rely solely on information contained in this email to evaluate the product or service being endorsed. Always exercise due diligence before purchasing any product or service. This website contains advertisements.